Comment by Jaap for If the original packet is in the capture and it's...
Provided we're talking about TCP here....
View ArticleComment by NJL for If the original packet is in the capture and it's...
I assumed that was the case yes, but you're absolutely correct.
View ArticleComment by Jim Aragon for If the original packet is in the capture and it's...
> If the original packet is not in the capture the retransmitted packet will be flagged as "out-of-order". Even if the original packet is missing, Wireshark will still try to distinguish between...
View ArticleComment by NJL for If the original packet is in the capture and it's...
Thanks for setting me straight, and thanks for the detailed explanation. Duly noted. :-)
View ArticleComment by Werner for If the original packet is in the capture and it's...
Thanks for you quick replies! Of course, we are talking about TCP. After 10 years of using wireshark I didn't know, that the tag [retransmission] is only set, if the original packet is present in the...
View ArticleAnswer by NJL for Is there an easy way to proof if a packet, which was missed...
If the original packet is in the capture and it's retransmitted for whatever reason, the retransmitted packet will be flagged as retransmission (fast, spurious or timer based retransmission). If the...
View ArticleProof if missing packets are present in capture
Is there an easy way to proof if a packet, which was missed by the receiver and had to be retransmittet, is present in the capture? In my case I'm analyzing packet loss in a transfer and want to proof...
View Article
